EENASU, a civilian Pre-2006 retiree
A mail from Col. Latif, which needs no further elaboration. This mail was addressed to those individuals and organisations who are fighting for justice in pensions of the JCOs/NCOs/ORs.
The hon Sc has ruled that EENASU, a civilian ,Pre-2006 retiree should get full pension with 20 years of service . The reason accepted is that is the CCSR mentions about civilians becoming eligible for pension in 20 years .
On similar anology , A soldier get eligible for his pension in 15 years of service and therefore Full pension should be given to him in 15 years and not even in 20 years . This if not implemented violates article 14 of the constitution when related to a civilian whose terms of engament for pension is 20 years where as the terms of engagement of a soldier is 15 years when placed similarly.
More over , if you see the family pension as being granted now vide 500,397 etc every family pensioner granted family pension gets full compliment irrespective of QS.
Therefore , the military pensioner is disadvantaged in the light of the above two points and violates article 14 of the constitution.
CAN ,OUR NEXT LEGAL CASE IN THE PIPELINE BE ON THESE LINES .TRY FULL PENSION FOR 15 BUT CERTAINLY GET IT FOR 20 YEARS QS. WHAT DOES OUR AFT-ADVOCATE ADVISE- 15 OR 20 ? 20 CERTAINLY MUST.
Comments
